
UI Libraries Compared: Shadcn/ui, Tailwind, Ant Design, Chakra, Material UI
_Introduction
In an ever-evolving front-end ecosystem, choosing the right UI library is like picking the best mode of transport for a journey: are you after speed? flexibility? enterprise-grade comfort? We’ve analyzed the five most relevant solutions for 2025 — shadcn/ui, Tailwind CSS, Ant Design, Chakra UI, and Material UI — to help you find the perfect match for your team and goals.
Today, the question is no longer just “which library should I use?” It’s become: “which combination delivers the best speed, consistency, and accessibility for our specific context?”
_UI Libraries 2025: A Snapshot
Before diving into the individual libraries, it’s worth taking a look at the big picture. Spoiler: Tailwind dominates in downloads, but that doesn’t always mean it’s the best choice. Each library strikes a different balance between adoption, freshness, and community support.
The following table offers a clear and immediate overview of the leading React UI libraries as of 2025. It highlights how active each project is (based on the latest release), how engaged the community is (via GitHub stars), how widespread it is (number of repositories using it), and how often it’s actually used in real-world projects (estimated weekly downloads via npm).
A technical note: shadcn/ui isn’t a library you install via npm — it’s a set of copyable components you integrate directly into your codebase. That’s why download metrics aren’t available, though its adoption is still high.
| Library | Latest Release | GitHub ⭐ | “Used by” Repos | Weekly Downloads* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tailwind CSS | v4.1.13 (Sep 4) | ~90.1k | 15.2M | ~23.2M |
| shadcn/ui | v3.2.1 (Sep 4) | ~94.6k | 26.5k | — |
| Ant Design | v5.27.3 (Sep 5) | ~96.0k | 745k | ~2.05M |
| Chakra UI | v3.26 (Aug 29) | ~39.7k | 386k | ~0.94M |
| Material UI | v7.3.2 (Sep 2) | ~96.6k | 2.0M | ~6.01M |
| Radix UI (Primitives) | – | ~17.8k | – | -** |
*Source: GitHub + npmtrends, September 2025.
**Source: Radix Primitives documentation, September 2025. Radix is a multi-package monorepo; downloads are distributed across many packages. The site reports 130M+ monthly aggregate downloads.
_When to Use Which Library
shadcn/ui — Don’t install a library. Copy the code.
shadcn/ui isn’t installed — it’s copied. You bring in pre-designed components built on Radix UI and Tailwind CSS, which you can fully customize. Ideal if you want full control with zero lock-in. Best suited for teams building a custom design system. Compatible with React 19 and Tailwind v4.
Best for: teams that want a custom visual system without compromising accessibility.
Tailwind CSS — Performance, productivity, zero components
The utility-first philosophy of Tailwind has become ubiquitous. Version 4 introduced the new Oxide engine, along with major performance and tooling improvements. It doesn’t include pre-built components — but gives you total freedom.
Best for: developers who want to build their UI from scratch (possibly with shadcn/ui) and avoid any predefined structure.
Ant Design — The enterprise default
A staple of enterprise dashboards. Ant Design provides everything: robust components, advanced theming, internationalization support. Version 5 is actively maintained, while version 6 is in alpha. Less visually flexible, but highly reliable.
Best for: enterprise teams working on complex, multilingual applications.
Chakra UI — Built-in accessibility, relaxed DX
Chakra is designed for fast, accessible, and consistent React development. Its components are well-structured, responsive, and easy to theme. Requires Node 20+, and works great with Next.js.
Best for: SaaS products, minimalist UIs, and small teams focused on UX.
Material UI — The most widely adopted design system
Material UI (formerly MUI) is one of the most popular and long-standing React UI frameworks. Based on Google’s Material Design guidelines, it offers a comprehensive suite of accessible and responsive components, complete with theming, dark mode, and advanced grid layouts. Especially strong for teams using tools like Figma.
Best for: public platforms, internal apps, or SaaS products that want a consistent, professional visual identity.
_Trends to Watch
Important note: shadcn/ui is not a full UI framework — it’s a system of components that relies on both Radix UI (for accessibility) and Tailwind CSS (for styling). Choosing shadcn/ui means adopting both, to some extent.
- React 19 is the new baseline: All major libraries are updating compatibility. Make sure your stack is ready.
- Copy-paste vs packages: Want automatic updates or full control? shadcn/ui is “open code”, the others are centralized packages.
- Themes and design tokens: Chakra, Tailwind, and Ant all have different approaches to design systems. Choose based on your internal workflows.
- Accessibility by default: Increasingly expected, even outside regulated industries. Radix (used in shadcn/ui), Chakra, and Material UI all have strong support here.
_Real-World Scenarios: What to Use and When
| Scenario | Recommended Stack | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Custom design systems | Tailwind v4 + shadcn/ui + Radix UI | Control, performance, composability |
| Enterprise backoffice | Ant Design 5.x | Component coverage, theming, i18n |
| Fast, accessible SaaS products | Chakra UI 3.x | Simplicity, DX, accessibility |
| High-traffic public apps | Material UI | Stability, consistency, Google’s visual standards |
_Conclusion
In a world where every millisecond of loading time and every pixel of consistency matters, choosing the right UI library is no longer a technical detail — it’s a strategic decision.
The good news? There’s no such thing as a one-size-fits-all library — but there’s definitely one that fits what you’re building.
Whether you’re creating a design system from scratch, optimizing an enterprise dashboard, or modernizing a legacy interface, what matters is choosing based on context — not trends.
And if you’d like help selecting the right stack or want to talk it through, you know where to find us.


